The study aimed to determine the relationship between the family climate and disruptive behavior in a sample of adolescents. The study also aimed to determine the nature of the differences between males and females on the scale of family climate and disruptive behavior. The research sample consisted of (158) individuals from male and female students in the preparatory stage, with 86 males and 72 females, this study belongs to the descriptive studies pattern, using the social survey method using the simple random sample method. The research tools included two scales, which are the family climate scale and’ disruptive behavior scale. The results of the study reached a set of results, the most important of which is the existence of a statistically significant positive relationship between the family climate and disruptive behavior among adolescents from middle school It also found that there were statistically insignificant differences between males and females on the family climate scale. It also found that there were statistically significant differences between males and females on the disruptive behavior scale in favor of males at a significance level of (0.01)..
Nafea, A. A. (2025). Family climate and its relationship to disruptive behavior and among a sample of adolescent’s preparatory school students. Journal of Social Work Studies, 71(4), 895-930. doi: 10.21608/dss.2025.393651.1406
MLA
Amira Ali Nafea. "Family climate and its relationship to disruptive behavior and among a sample of adolescent’s preparatory school students", Journal of Social Work Studies, 71, 4, 2025, 895-930. doi: 10.21608/dss.2025.393651.1406
HARVARD
Nafea, A. A. (2025). 'Family climate and its relationship to disruptive behavior and among a sample of adolescent’s preparatory school students', Journal of Social Work Studies, 71(4), pp. 895-930. doi: 10.21608/dss.2025.393651.1406
VANCOUVER
Nafea, A. A. Family climate and its relationship to disruptive behavior and among a sample of adolescent’s preparatory school students. Journal of Social Work Studies, 2025; 71(4): 895-930. doi: 10.21608/dss.2025.393651.1406